Infinity Integrated Publishing Center

Vaccination paradox in Bluetongue control: a review

Anna C. Procopio1,Alessio Soggiu2,Mariachiara Paonessa1,Emanuela Laratta1,Hany A. Hussein3,Paola Roncada1*
1Department of Health Science, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Italy
2Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milano, Italy
3Department of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensivological and Perioperative Clinics, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
*Correspondence: Paola Roncada
Vol. 2, Issue 1 (2026)
Published:19 June 2026
Review articleopen access
7
Views
0
Downloads

Abstract

The bluetongue virus (BTV) is the causative agent of bluetongue, a non-contagious viral disease that affects ruminants. It is transmitted by insects of the Culicoides genus. The disease's complexity is reflected in the large number of recognized serotypes. This disease can be particularly severe in sheep, causing symptoms such as fever, facial edema, cyanosis of the tongue, oral lesions, lameness, and high mortality. Cattle serve as a subclinical reservoir. Controlling BTV is a crucial challenge in livestock farming, requiring the identification of innovative vaccination strategies that induce effective immunity against the various circulating serotypes. In this context, the "vaccine paradox" of BTV emerges, revealing a discrepancy between the proven immunological efficacy of available vaccines and their inability to ensure stable epidemiological control. This paper investigates the reasons for this discrepancy and clarifies the structural limitations that prevent current vaccination strategies from achieving this.

Key Questions

Why does vaccination, despite being considered the preferred method of control for bluetongue, not always achieve full epidemiological control?

Keywords

BluetongueCattleSheepVaccineVectorVirus